Website owner:  James Miller

My views on Christianity in America

   I would group Christianity in America into three main 
   divisions:
     1.  Roman Catholic  
     2.  Liberal Protestant 
     3.  Conservative Protestant   
   In addition there are some cults such as the Jehovah's 
   Witnesses and the Mormons.  I immediately reject the cults and 
   my feelings on the three main groups are as follows:

  Roman Catholic.  I feel Roman Catholicism bears little 
   resemblance to the Christianity that I find in the New 
   Testament.  I believe it has gotten way off course.  It 
   contains all kinds of beliefs, ideas and practices that I find 
   no support for in the New Testament. Examples:  Mariology, the 
   body of belief and dogma relating to the Virgin Mary.  Practice 
   of praying to saints.  Belief in purgatory.  Practice of 
   "confession".  Emphasis placed on various rites.  I don't feel 
   that Roman Catholicism is close to my conception of true 
   Christianity in dogma, spirit or outlook.   It is too oriented 
   toward rite and ritual.

  Liberal Protestant.  The liberal Protestants have lost their 
   way.  They have lost their faith in the reliability and 
   trustworthiness of the Bible and, as a consequence, have 
   strayed far from its teachings, attitudes and outlooks.  They 
   interpret everything as they wish and ignore what they don't 
   like.  They have drifted into secular humanism. They ought not 
   call themselves Christian.  They have strayed too far from the 
   Bible to be called Christian.

  Conservative Protestant.  I feel conservative Protestantism has 
   also gotten way off course.  Although they believe in the 
   reliability and trustworthiness of the Bible they have become 
   misled by a theology based on a body of scripture that 
   emphasizes salvation by faith and not by works while ignoring 
   another body of scripture that teaches that only the upright, 
   only those who practice and follow God's way, will go to 
   heaven.  As a consequence, while I would emphasize the 
   importance of practice and obedience, of upright living, they 
   spend all their time thanking God that they are saved and never 
   talk of obedience.  They believe one can become saved through 
   some act, rite, or religious experience, they all preach some 
   recipe or formula for becoming saved, and after that it is all, 
   "Thank God, I am saved!  Hallelujah!  Thank God, I am saved!".  
   I believe they are guilty of a great deal of self-deception, 
   self-delusion.   I think they become mesmerized, brainwashed, 
   deceived by oft repeated, glib, nice sounding slogans, 
   phrases and assertions.  While I would represent Christianity 
   as a hard, narrow way characterized by a love of God that 
   necessitates rejection of the world and its outlooks and values 
   and by principled, chaste, upright living (with all the 
   seriousness, self-control, self-denial, self-discipline, 
   temperance, etc. that such living implies), for them it is an 
   easy way of getting saved and then singing about how happy they 
   are that they have been saved and are going to heaven (and of 
   witnessing to others about how simple and easy it all is).  
   They dogmatically insist that salvation is a free gift, that 
   you can't earn it, that all one need do is claim it, that we 
   are all simply sinners saved by grace.  Their dogma does away 
   with the importance of upright living as far as salvation is 
   concerned.  Upright living becomes something separate and 
   apart.  Its connection to salvation is ambiguous, nebulous. 


   May 2009