SolitaryRoad.com

Website owner:  James Miller


[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]

Metric spaces as topological spaces. Equivalent metrics. Metrization problem. Isometric metric spaces.



Metric spaces. A metric space is a kind of topological space. In a metric space any union of open sets in is open and any finite intersection of open sets in is open. Consequently a metric space meets the axiomatic requirements of a topological space and is thus a topological space. It was, in fact, this particular property of a metric space that was used to define a topological space.


Theorem 1. The collection of open spheres in a set X with metric d is a base for a topology on X.


Def. Metric topology. Let d be a metric on a non-empty set X. The topology τ on X generated by the collection of open spheres in X is called the metric topology (or, the topology induced by the metric d).


The set X together with the topology τ induced by the metric d is a metric space. A metric space then can be viewed as a topological space in which the topology is induced by a metric.


Example 1. Let d be the usual metric in three dimensional space R3. Then the set of open spheres in R3 constitute a base for a topology on R3. Thus the usual metric on R3 induces the usual topology on R3, the collection of all open sets.


Example 2. Let d be the usual metric on the real line R, i.e. d(a, b) = |a - b|. Then the open spheres in R correspond to the finite open intervals in R. Thus the usual metric on R induces the usual topology, the set of all open intervals, on R. 


Example 3. Let d be the trivial metric on some set X. Note that for any p ε X, S(p, 1/2) = {p}. Thus every singleton set (set consisting of only one element) is open and consequently every set is open. Hence the trivial metric induces the discrete topology on X.



Properties of metric topologies


Theorem 2. Let p be a point is a metric space X. Then the countable class of open spheres {S(p, 1), S(p, 1/2), S(p, 1/3), S(p, 1/4), .....}is a local base at p.


Theorem 3. The closure ole.gif of a subset A of a metric space X is the set of points whose distance from A is zero.


In a metric space all singleton sets {p} are closed.


Theorem 4. In a metric space all finite sets are closed.


ole1.gif

Following is an important “separation” property of metric spaces.


Theorem 5 (Separation Axiom). Let A and B be closed disjoint subsets of a metric space. Then there exist disjoint open sets G and H such that A ole2.gif G and B ole3.gif H. See Fig. 1.


One might think that the distance between two disjoint closed sets would be greater than zero. However, this is not necessarily the case as the following example shows.


ole4.gif

Example 4. The two sets


            A = {(x, y): xy ole5.gif -1, x < 0}

            B = {(x, y): xy ole6.gif 1, x > 0}


are shown in Fig. 2. Both sets are closed and they are disjoint. However, d(A, B) = 0.


Def. Equivalent metrics. Two metrics on a set X are said to be equivalent if and only if they induce the same topology on X.


Two metrics d and d* on a set X induce the same topology on X if and only if the open spheres of the d metric and the open spheres of the d* metric are bases for the same topology on X.


Example 5. Let P(x1, y1) and Q(x2, y2) be two arbitrary points in the plane R2. The usual metric d and the two metrics d1 and d2 defined by


            d1(P, Q) = max ( |x1 - x2|, |y1 - y2| )


and


ole7.gif

            d2(P, Q) = |x1 - x2| + |y1 - y2|

                                                                        

all induce the usual topology on the plane R2 since the collection of open spheres of each metric is a base for the usual topology on R2. Fig. 3 shows the open spheres of each of the three metrics. Thus the three metrics are equivalent.



Metrization problem. Given any topological space X with a topology τ it is natural to ask if a metric exists for the space i.e. if there exists any metric d that would induce that topology τ. If one exists the space is said to be metrizable. Under what conditions is a particular topological space metrizable?


A topological space is metrizable if a distance between points can be defined so the space is a metric space such that open sets in the original space are open sets in the metric space, and conversely; i.e. there exists a topological transformation between the given space and a metric space. A compact Hausdorff is metrizable if and only if it satisfies the second axiom of countability; a regular T1 topological space is metrizible if it satisfies the second axiom of countability (Urysohn’s theorem). A topological space is metrizible if and only if it is a regular T1 topological space whose topology has a base B which is the union of a countable number of classes {Bn} of open sets which have the property that, for each point x and class Bn, there is a neighborhood of x which intersects only a finite number of the members of Bn.


                                                                                                James & James. Mathematics Dictionary




Isometric metric spaces. A metric space (X, d) is isometric to a metric space (Y, e) if and only if there exists a one-to-one onto function f: X ole8.gif Y which preserves distances, i.e. for all p, q ε X,


            d(p, q) = e(f(p), f(q))



Theorem 6. If the metric space (X, d) is isometric to (Y, e), then (X, d) is also homeomorphic to (Y, e).





References

1. Lipschutz. General Topology

2. Simmons. Introduction to Topology and Modern Analysis

3. James & James. Mathematics Dictionary



More from SolitaryRoad.com:

The Way of Truth and Life

God's message to the world

Jesus Christ and His Teachings

Words of Wisdom

Way of enlightenment, wisdom, and understanding

Way of true Christianity

America, a corrupt, depraved, shameless country

On integrity and the lack of it

The test of a person's Christianity is what he is

Who will go to heaven?

The superior person

On faith and works

Ninety five percent of the problems that most people have come from personal foolishness

Liberalism, socialism and the modern welfare state

The desire to harm, a motivation for conduct

The teaching is:

On modern intellectualism

On Homosexuality

On Self-sufficient Country Living, Homesteading

Principles for Living Life

Topically Arranged Proverbs, Precepts, Quotations. Common Sayings. Poor Richard's Almanac.

America has lost her way

The really big sins

Theory on the Formation of Character

Moral Perversion

You are what you eat

People are like radio tuners --- they pick out and listen to one wavelength and ignore the rest

Cause of Character Traits --- According to Aristotle

These things go together

Television

We are what we eat --- living under the discipline of a diet

Avoiding problems and trouble in life

Role of habit in formation of character

The True Christian

What is true Christianity?

Personal attributes of the true Christian

What determines a person's character?

Love of God and love of virtue are closely united

Walking a solitary road

Intellectual disparities among people and the power in good habits

Tools of Satan. Tactics and Tricks used by the Devil.

On responding to wrongs

Real Christian Faith

The Natural Way -- The Unnatural Way

Wisdom, Reason and Virtue are closely related

Knowledge is one thing, wisdom is another

My views on Christianity in America

The most important thing in life is understanding

Sizing up people

We are all examples --- for good or for bad

Television --- spiritual poison

The Prime Mover that decides "What We Are"

Where do our outlooks, attitudes and values come from?

Sin is serious business. The punishment for it is real. Hell is real.

Self-imposed discipline and regimentation

Achieving happiness in life --- a matter of the right strategies

Self-discipline

Self-control, self-restraint, self-discipline basic to so much in life

We are our habits

What creates moral character?


[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]