SolitaryRoad.com

Website owner:  James Miller


[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]

Zeros, poles, Argument principle, Rouche’s theorem



Zeros and poles


ole.gif

Let f(z) be analytic inside and on a simple closed curve C, except for possibly a finite number of poles in the region R inside C. Consider the curve that is traced out in the w plane by f(z) as the point z goes around C once in the positive direction. As z goes around C, f(z) describes some closed curve. See Fig. 1. How f(z) behaves depends on the number of zeros and poles of f(z) in R.          

                                                                                    

Case 1. There are no poles in R. Suppose f(z) has one simple zero in R. Then as z goes around C once in the positive direction, f(z) will wind around the origin once in the positive (counterclockwise) direction. Suppose there are two simple zeros in R. Then as z goes around C once in the positive direction, f(z) will wind around the origin twice in the positive direction. Suppose there is one zero of order three in R. Then as z goes around C once in the positive direction, f(z) will wind around the origin three times in the positive direction.


Case 2. There are no zeros in R. Let f(z) have one simple pole in R. Then as z goes around C once in the positive direction, f(z) will wind around the origin once in the negative (clockwise) direction. If there is one pole of order 3 in R, then as z goes around C, f(z) will wind around the origin three times in the negative direction. If there are 3 simple poles in R, then as z goes around C, f(z) will wind around the origin three times in the negative direction.

 

Case 3. There are both zeros and poles in R. Suppose f(z) has one simple zero and two simple poles in R. Then as z goes around C once in the positive direction, f(z) will wind around the origin once in the negative direction. Suppose f(z) has three simple zeros and one simple pole in R. Then as z goes around C once in the positive direction, f(z) will wind around the origin twice in the positive direction.


Thus we see that as point z makes one trip around C in the positive direction, f(z) makes n trips around the origin where n is given by the total number of zeros within C minus the total number of poles within C. If n is negative it indicates trips in the negative direction. A zero (or pole) of order m is counted as m zeros (or poles).


How f(z) behaves as z goes around C can also be expressed in terms of the change in the argument of f(z), Δ arg f(z), when z makes one trip about C. If there is a single zero and no poles, Δ arg f(z) = 2π. If there are three zeros and no poles, ΔC arg f(z) = 3 ·2π = 6π, etc.


Let us now consider an example that will give insight into what is happening. Let f(z) be the polynomial


1)        f(z) = a0zn + a1zn-1 + ... + an = a0(z - z1)(z - z2) ... (z - zn)

 

which we have decomposed into linear factors. The numbers z1, z2, ... , zn correspond to the zeros of f(z).


From the formula


             ole1.gif


we know the product of several complex numbers is equal to the sum of the arguments of the factors. Thus


2)        arg f(z) = arg a0 + arg (z - z1) + arg (z - z2) + ........ + arg (z - zn) .


Let Δ arg f(z) be the change in the argument of f(z) when z makes one trip about C. Then Δ arg f(z) will be equal to 2π times the number of times the point f(z) winds around the origin.     Now it is clear that when z makes one trip about C

 

3)        Δ arg f(z) = Δ arg a0 + Δ arg (z - z1) + Δ arg (z - z2) + ........ + Δ arg (z - zn) . 


ole2.gif

Now Δ arg a0 = 0 since a0 is a constant. We note that z - z1 corresponds to a vector extending from point z1 to point z. Let us assume that z1 lies in the interior of the region. See Fig. 2. From the figure it is clear that as the point z goes around the curve C the vector z - z1 makes a complete revolution about its initial point. Consequently Δ arg (z - z1) = 2π. Let us now assume that point z2 lies outside the region as shown in the figure. In this case the vector z - z2 moves from side to side and returns to its original position without making a revolution about its initial point. Thus Δ arg (z - z1) = 0. We can reason the same way about all the roots. Thus Δ arg f(z) is equal to 2π times the number of roots of f(z) lying in the interior of the region. And the number of roots inside the region is equal to the number of times the point f(z) winds around the origin.


We just considered a function that had zeros and no poles.   Let us now consider one with poles. Consider the function


ole3.gif                                                                                                                                                   

Here q1, q2, ... , qm are the zeros and p1, p2, ... , pn the poles of f(z). Then


5)        arg f(z) = arg a0 + arg (z - q1) + arg (z - q2) + ........ + arg (z - qn)

                                    - arg b0 - arg (z - p1) - arg (z - p2) - ........ - arg (z - pn)


When z makes one trip about C, Δ arg f(z) is given by

 

6)        Δ arg f(z) = Δ arg a0 + Δ arg (z - q1) + Δ arg (z - q2) + ........ + Δ arg (z - qn)  

                                    - Δ arg b0 - Δ arg (z - p1) - Δ arg (z - p2) - ........ - Δ arg (z - pn)



We now reason exactly as we did in the previous example.  If the pole p1 is inside C, then as the point z goes around the curve C the vector z - p1 makes a complete revolution about its initial point. Consequently Δ arg (z - p1) = 2π. In 6) this increment has a negative sign attached to it, so it is subtracted from the total for Δ arg f(z). All zeros and poles lying inside the region contribute to the total for Δ arg f(z). Contributions from the zeros are added and contributions from the poles are subtracted. Zeros and poles lying outside the region don’t contribute. Thus Δ arg f(z) is equal to 2π(N - P)   where N is the number of zeros and P is the number of poles inside C. The number of times the point f(z) winds around the origin is given by N - P.                



Theorem 1. If f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple, closed curve C , except for a pole of order p at z = a inside C, then


             ole4.gif


If f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple, closed curve C , except for a zero of order n at z = a inside C, then


             ole5.gif


Proof


Theorem 2. Let f(z) be analytic inside and on a simple, closed curve C , except for j poles of orders m1, m2, ... mj at points α1, α2, ..., αj and k zeros of orders n1, n2, ... nk at points β1, β2, ..., βk, all located in the region inside C. Suppose that f(z) ole6.gif 0 on C. Then


ole7.gif


Proof


If, in the above theorem, we let P = m1 + m2 + ... + mj and Z = n1 + n2 + ... + nk,

then


ole8.gif



Argument principle. Let f(z) be analytic inside and on a simple closed curve C, except for a finite number of poles inside C. Let Z and P be the number of zeros and poles (multiplicities counted, each zero or pole counted a number of times equal to its order) inside C. Let Δ arg f(z) be the change in arg f(z) as z makes one trip about C in the positive (counterclockwise) direction. Then 


            Δ arg f(z) = 2π (Z - P)


Proof



Theorem 3. Let C be a simple, closed curve and R be the open region interior to C. Let f and g be functions analytic on C and its interior R, except for a finite number of zeros and poles in its interior, and satisfying | f | > | g | on C. Then the difference between the number of zeros and poles of f in R (multiplicities counted, each zero or pole counted a number of times equal to its order) is equal to the difference between the number of zeros and poles of f + g in R.



Rouche’s theorem. If f(z) and g(z) are analytic inside and on a simple closed curve C and if |g(z)| < |f(z)| on C, then f(z) + g(z) and f(z) have the same number of zeros inside C.


Proof





References

  Mathematics, Its Content, Method and Meaning. Vol. I

  Wylie. Advanced Engineering Mathematics

  Hauser. Complex Variables with Physical Applications



More from SolitaryRoad.com:

The Way of Truth and Life

God's message to the world

Jesus Christ and His Teachings

Words of Wisdom

Way of enlightenment, wisdom, and understanding

Way of true Christianity

America, a corrupt, depraved, shameless country

On integrity and the lack of it

The test of a person's Christianity is what he is

Who will go to heaven?

The superior person

On faith and works

Ninety five percent of the problems that most people have come from personal foolishness

Liberalism, socialism and the modern welfare state

The desire to harm, a motivation for conduct

The teaching is:

On modern intellectualism

On Homosexuality

On Self-sufficient Country Living, Homesteading

Principles for Living Life

Topically Arranged Proverbs, Precepts, Quotations. Common Sayings. Poor Richard's Almanac.

America has lost her way

The really big sins

Theory on the Formation of Character

Moral Perversion

You are what you eat

People are like radio tuners --- they pick out and listen to one wavelength and ignore the rest

Cause of Character Traits --- According to Aristotle

These things go together

Television

We are what we eat --- living under the discipline of a diet

Avoiding problems and trouble in life

Role of habit in formation of character

The True Christian

What is true Christianity?

Personal attributes of the true Christian

What determines a person's character?

Love of God and love of virtue are closely united

Walking a solitary road

Intellectual disparities among people and the power in good habits

Tools of Satan. Tactics and Tricks used by the Devil.

On responding to wrongs

Real Christian Faith

The Natural Way -- The Unnatural Way

Wisdom, Reason and Virtue are closely related

Knowledge is one thing, wisdom is another

My views on Christianity in America

The most important thing in life is understanding

Sizing up people

We are all examples --- for good or for bad

Television --- spiritual poison

The Prime Mover that decides "What We Are"

Where do our outlooks, attitudes and values come from?

Sin is serious business. The punishment for it is real. Hell is real.

Self-imposed discipline and regimentation

Achieving happiness in life --- a matter of the right strategies

Self-discipline

Self-control, self-restraint, self-discipline basic to so much in life

We are our habits

What creates moral character?


[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]